Sustainable

Vegan vs Lacto-Ovo vs Convenience Vegetarian

2026.02.09 · The TeaVegVoyage team

Why we only do 100% vegan — the carbon difference between three diets.

There is a great deal of difference within vegetarianism, and it is worth distinguishing three common positions.

Vegan: no animal products at all, the lowest carbon footprint, and the standard we require on every journey. Lacto-ovo vegetarian: includes eggs and dairy, with a footprint roughly 1.5 times a vegan one, mostly at the agricultural stage. Convenience vegetarian: vegetarian occasionally and meat-based most of the time, with a footprint close to an ordinary diet and essentially no carbon saving.

One dimension that is often overlooked is transport and packaging: a locally grown, in-season lacto-ovo meal may have a lower footprint than vegan ingredients flown in from abroad. So local and vegan matter equally.

TeaVegVoyage insists on 100 per cent vegan, not because lacto-ovo vegetarianism is bad, but because insisting is itself a choice: if you are going to do it, do it at the level that needs no explanation.

One practical line to take away: rather than agonising over labels, remember local, in season, little packaging. Their effect on your footprint is often larger than the vegetarian category itself.

More from Sustainable?

Every article in this column sits behind one door.

Back to Sustainable →